JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 6, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Rafael Hernando Lara Mayorga

✓
Topic · hard data
Aclaracion Sentencia C-1096/01
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia de aclaración o adición
  • Obligatorio cumplimiento
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se rechazó la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-1096/01 formulada por el ciudadano de la referencia, toda vez que ninguna norma de la Constitución Política que reglamenta la jurisdicción constitucional, confiere a la Corte la facultad de aclarar sus sentencias.

Según lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional no tiene competencia para proferir nuevas decisiones sobre asuntos ya fallados ni para adicionar las sentencias ya dictadas, así como tampoco para aclarar sus fallos, los cuales son de obligatorio cumplimiento.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Rechazar la solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-1096 de 2001, formulada por el ciudadano Rafael Hernando Lara Mayorga.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.